From owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Fri Oct 25 03:12:57 2002
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id g9OICvb06546;
	Fri, 25 Oct 2002 03:12:57 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail16.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.216])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id g9OICq306536
	for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 03:12:52 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 4957 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 18:12:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63])
          (envelope-sender <jhb@FreeBSD.org>)
          by mail16.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP
          for <acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; 24 Oct 2002 18:12:57 -0000
Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1])
	by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9OICnn5071687;
	Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:12:49 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <XFMail.20021024141253.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20021025.010825.21921314.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Reply-To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:12:53 -0400
X-Sequence: acpi-jp 1904
Subject: [acpi-jp 1904] Re: Any objections to renaming 'device acpica' to
Errors-To: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: jhb@FreeBSD.org
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+021018


On 24-Oct-2002 Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
>> Are there any objections to renaming the new-bus ACPI device
>> from acpica to acpi to match the character device, kernel module,
>> and manpage names?
> 
> I have no objections.
> And how about changing sys/dev/acpica/ to sys/dev/acpi/ ?

Hmm good point.  I can do that as well if desired.  I think the
contrib code should stay where it is since Intel's code drop
is called ACPICA.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
