From owner-man-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Wed Sep 16 23:42:54 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.1+3.0W/8.7.3) id XAA00333;
	Wed, 16 Sep 1998 23:42:54 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-man-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.kt.rim.or.jp (root@mail.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.53])
	by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.9.1+3.0W/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA00323
	for <man-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 23:42:52 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp)
Received: from moon.sky.rim.or.jp (ppp372.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.140.72])
	by mail.kt.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.6W-RIMNET-98-06-09) with ESMTP id XAA25850
	for <man-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 23:42:50 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sky.rim.or.jp (earth [192.168.1.2]) by moon.sky.rim.or.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl4/moon-1.0) with ESMTP id XAA00565 for <man-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 23:41:16 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <35FFCD82.FC5120DE@sky.rim.or.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 23:38:58 +0900
From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [ja] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: man-jp <man-jp@jp.freebsd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------07AAFDD2A5913524EC15ACEE"
Reply-To: man-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+980914
X-Sequence: man-jp 1148
Subject: [man-jp 1148] [Fwd: Can we branch doc/ja/man?]
Errors-To: owner-man-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-man-jp@jp.freebsd.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------07AAFDD2A5913524EC15ACEE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

$B!!$&!<$s!":G6a(B John Fieber $B@E$+$@$+$i=P$F$3$J$$$+$H;W$C$?$N$K(B(^^;)$B!#A*Br(B
$B;h$H$7$F$O!"(B

1. branch $B$;$:$K(B HEAD $B$rDI$&(B
2. $B;W$$@Z$C$F(B doc/ja/man $B$r(B branch $B$5$;$k(B
3. $B$d$O$j(B man $B$O(B src/ $B0J2<$NE,Ev$J$H$3$m$KCV$-!"3F(B branch $B$rDI$&(B

$B$C$F$N$,$"$k$+$H;W$&$s$G$9$,!#$I$&$b(B Handbook $B$d(B FAQ $B$HF1Ns$K07$C$F$$$k(B
$B8=>u$K$OL5M}$,$"$k$h$&$J5$$O$7$^$9!#(B

> Have things changed?

$B!!$C$FJ9$+$l$k$H:$$k$s$G$9$,!"Ev;~$3$3$^$G$G$-$k$H$O;W$C$F$$$J$+$C$?$[(B
$B$I!"$^$a$K(B -stable $B$KDI=>$G$-$F$^$9$+$i!"Fs$D$N(B branch $B$rDI$&$3$H$,$G$-(B
$B$k$[$I0BDj$7$F$-$?!"$H$$$&$3$H$G$7$g$&$+!#(B


-- 
$B$/$j$d$^(B // kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp
        // kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG
--------------07AAFDD2A5913524EC15ACEE
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: (from uucp@localhost) by moon.sky.rim.or.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl4/moon-1.0) with UUCP id HAA00832 for kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 07:08:30 +0900 (JST)
Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by rayearth.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-uucp1/RIMNET) with ESMTP
	id AAA01640 for <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:02:39 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost)
	by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA07512;
	Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:02:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 10:02:27 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>
cc: committers <committers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Can we branch doc/ja/man?
In-Reply-To: <35FE38FE.E09093DD@sky.rim.or.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809150952450.1070-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Jun Kuriyama wrote:

> We are working in doc/ja/man for RELENG_2_2 branch now.  But manpage
> diffs between RELENG_2_2 and HEAD is pretty big, so we started to
> prepare translation for 3.0-RELEASE.

Historically, the main reason for separating out the doc tree
from the main freebsd src tree was to provide a "branch free
zone" for things like the Handbook and FAQ where maintaining
separate branches is non-sensical. In previous conversations
about where to put the Japanese translations, I raised this as an
issue and was given the argument[1] that this branch free zone
was exactly what the Japanese man pages needed.

Have things changed?

It is fine if they have but could some CVS expert shed light on
the practicality/hassles of having part of the doc tree branched
with the other part not?

-john

[1] I probably have most of the email transactions on the
subject, but not ready at hand.


--------------07AAFDD2A5913524EC15ACEE--

