From owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Tue Apr 23 11:46:54 2002
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) id g3N2ksE42512;
	Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:46:54 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cttsv003.ctt.ne.jp (cttsv003.ctt.ne.jp [210.166.4.131])
	by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id g3N2ks442507
	for <FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:46:54 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from uchiyama@pp.iij4u.or.jp)
Received: from uchiyama.pp.iij4u.or.jp (u217.d026166210.ctt.ne.jp [210.166.26.217]) by cttsv003.ctt.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W99111611) id LAA21078 for <FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:46:55 +0900 (JST)
To: FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <200204230132.g3N1WB221029@r-nn.iij4u.or.jp>
References: <200204220508.g3M58i215854@r-nn.iij4u.or.jp>
 <200204230132.g3N1WB221029@r-nn.iij4u.or.jp>
From: Koji Uchiyama <uchiyama@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
Message-Id: <20020423114648-21653S.uchiyama@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:46:48 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp (auto-converted from EUC)
Lines: 46
Reply-To: FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Precedence: list
X-Distribute: distribute version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel 24e+020417
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-users-jp 68197
Subject: [FreeBSD-users-jp 68197] loopback should never be configured first ? (Re: dhclient 
	=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJCwhIiFWGyhC?= No route to host
 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCIVckSCQkJCYbKEI=?=)
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-users-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
X-Originator: uchiyama@pp.iij4u.or.jp


$BFb;3$H?=$7$^$9(B

# subject $BJQ$($^$7$?(B

>  network_interfaces="lo0 faith0"

$B0JA0$+$i5$$K$J$C$F$$$k$3$H$,$"$k$N$G$9$,!"(B
$B$I$J$?$+8fB8CN$G$7$?$i65$($F2<$5$$!#(B

lo(4) $B$K$O0J2<$N$h$&$J5-=R$,$"$j!"(Bloopback $B$O:G8e$K@_Dj$7$m$H=q$$$F$"$j$^$9!#(B

     These addresses may be set or changed with the SIOCSIFADDR ioctl(2).  The
     loopback interface should be the last interface configured, as protocols
     may use the order of configuration as an indication of priority.  The
     loopback should never be configured first unless no hardware interfaces
     exist.

$BM}M3$H$7$F(B
as protocols may use the order of configuration as an indication of priority
$B$H$J$C$F$$$^$9$,!"(B
$B$I$&$$$&>u67$GLdBj$,H/@8$9$k$N$G$7$g$&$+!)(B

$B$^$?!"$3$N(B "order of configuration" $B$H$$$&$N$O(B
$B6qBNE*$K$O$I$N$h$&$JA`:n$r9T$&=gHV$J$N$G$7$g$&$+!)(B

ifconfig $B$r9T$&=gHV$+$H;W$C$?$N$G$9$,!"(B
src/sbin/ifconfig/* $B$r(B fgrep $B$7$F$b(B SIOCSIFADDR $B$,8+$D$+$i$J$$$N$G(B
ifconfig $B$r9T$&=gHV$G$O$J$$$N$G$7$g$&$+!)(B

# network_interfaces="lo0 lnc0 ed0" $B$J$I$H$$$&@_Dj$G(B
# $B1?MQ$7$?7P83$,$"$j$^$9$,!"FC$K:$$C$?$3$H$O$"$j$^$;$s$G$7$?!#(B
# $B$G$b!"2?$+5$;}$A0-$$$N$G!"%5!<%PN`$K4X$7$F$O(B
# $B$$$A$*$&(B lo0 $B$r(B ethernet $B$N8e$K$7$F1?MQ$7$F$$$^$9!#(B

RELENG_3 $B7ONs$G$N(B ifconfig -l $B$O(B
$BNc$($P(B ed1 sis0 lp0 tun0 sl0 ppp0 lo0 $B$N$h$&$K(B
lo0 $B$,:G8e$K$J$C$F$$$k$H;W$$$^$9!#(B
$B$3$l$KBP$7!"(B
RELENG_4 $B7ONs$G$N(B ifconfig -l $B$O(B
$BNc$($P(B vr0 ed0 lo0 ppp0 sl0 faith0 $B$N$h$&$K(B
lo0 $B$,:G8e$H$O8B$i$J$$$h$&$G$9$,!"(B
$B2?$+?<$$M}M3$,$"$C$FJQ99$K$J$C$F$$$k$N$G$7$g$&$+!)(B

--
Koji Uchiyama <uchiyama@pp.iij4u.or.jp>
